lol, that is one long post bit >.<'
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bit And by calling it outdated, you're only proving how closed-minded you are to the matter. |
– yes. As you can see I realised my error soon after posting, and revised my post before you posted your reply. Case closed.
-----
Obviously you are missing the points I pressed; “Thank God for Avalon, who can pick apart a post to the point of where it doesn't make sense!”
So I’ll spell out what I meant for your benefit.
You said:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bit It's wrong to say you're better than a person because of relgion though. Why? Because we will never know until you go kill yourself. You will never know. From any scientific standpoint, relgion is an absolute waste of time. The possibility of a God is unprovable, and so far out there. How many times in the past has a religion been squashed, because it's wrong? By whose standards then?
It's by the people with more power, plain and simple.
People have religion all wrong. It should be personal. You shouldn't care about religion, considering most of you seem to "accept" all religion. It's a belief. Not something worth complaining, or dying over. But people use it as superiority. |
I assumed that the statement “It's wrong to say you're better than a person because of relgion though.” was not directed at me (as I didn’t ‘say I was better than any person because of religion’) – so I overlooked that.
However, I when I read “Why? Because we will never know until you go kill yourself. You will never know. The possibility of a God is unprovable, and so far out there.” I disagreed, and responding with:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AvalonX – you throw around unsubstantiated statements like they’re confetti. Shit dude, how do you know we will never prove there is/isn’t a God? Humans have ~3 billion years until the Earth is consumed by the sun to discover the truths of their own hypothetical bouts. You, a high school student who presents such a prejudiced argument – a person whom is so utterly dwarfed by his haphazard statements should not attempt to divulge a human sociological future that he can not possibly know the outcome of. |
Then you stated “How many times in the past has a religion been squashed, because it's wrong? By whose standards then? It's by the people with more power, plain and simple.” This is not plain and simple; in fact it makes little sense and is grammatically verbose. However, as I overlooked the “It's by the people with more power, plain and simple,” I replied:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AvalonX by the standards of logic. |
This at the time seemed an alright response, but obviously now it makes little sense too.
Then you say:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bit People have religion all wrong. It should be personal. You shouldn't care about religion, considering most of you seem to "accept" all religion. |
Which is a prejudice assumption that ‘atheists’ (i assume you are talking about atheists as you do not specifiy which group of 'people') have religion ‘all wrong’. You tell me what I (or other posters) should do; “You shouldn't care about religion, considering most of you seem to "accept" all religion”; which is completely out the thread’s topic context and proves to be critically ridiculing.
You continue:
“It's a belief. Not something worth complaining, or dying over. But people use it as superiority”
Which is fine… and I don’t reply to this.
Next bit, you say in response to”
this thread was bullshit, and thats why (i'd assume) bit was pissed.
...granted, hes pissed all the time. but stuff like this gets even me kinda angry.
why is it bullshit? because it challenges your mentality?”:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bit It's bullshit for the reasons he stated TWO LINES ABOVE THE ONLY PART YOU QUOTED. See:
Originally Posted by Mr. Plays_With_Squirrels
if you agree with the idea that religion should be personal...why are you making threads that criticize and belittle peoples beliefs?
why bring up religion, when you're as aware as i am...that none of us will have anything to say that could possibly sway or influence any of our minds?
P.S.- It's not challenging mentality when a person is smart enough to not get involved at all. Didn't he make it clear he doesn't give a rat's ass? |
luxoPlus says that “if you agree with the idea that religion should be personal...why are you making threads that criticize and belittle peoples beliefs?” “
why bring up religion, when you're as aware as i am...that none of us will have anything to say that could possibly sway or influence any of our minds?” and I replied:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AvalonX i haven't vindictively criticized anyone's beliefes (the only time I brushed on this was when i asked bit to extend himself and give his answer another try), nor did i ever intend to to belittle them (note that stating my own opinion is not a intented disparagement). I merely questioned. so i'll skip your first paragraph because it is your misconception. |
I therefore skipped his first paragraph because ‘it [was his] misconception’. With that established – his argument criticizing my thread lay to rest – I probed to see if he had an allegorized reason for condemn it. Asking: “why is it bullshit? because it challenges your mentality?”
He didn’t rely, but you did.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bit P.S.- It's not challenging mentality when a person is smart enough to not get involved at all. Didn't he make it clear he doesn't give a rat's ass? |
He didn’t when he said “stuff like this gets even me kinda angry”.
Ok, you continue:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bit People have religion all wrong. |
and I ask “Who exactly has it all wrong? Please be specific.” You bold ‘people’? You must have misunderstood what I mean. WHAT GROUP OF
PEOPLE?
Then you quote me saying ‘obviously…’ in response to you saying “[Religion] should be personal” “It's a belief”. Saying: “Ok, if it's so obvious, then why the shit did you asked "Who exactly has it all wrong?" just ONE quote before?”
This makes little to no sense. So I won’t even bother.
Then you say:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bit The point is, people go by religion the wrong way. It's not something to spread, or compare to others. Since it SHOULD be private, but isn't, it's gone by the wrong way. Which is why I am against things like Bible study groups, and other things like Youth Groups. |
And I will reply now: what has this to do with “Why believe in a Christian god when the spiritual portions of the bible's texts are unempirical? - a question i ask myself everytime is see a preist.”?
Note: I know I’ve staved off topic myself to reply to other posts; however I haven’t drawn upon random ideas – like the above.
You say after all this in response to something I said which annoyed you:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bit A religion is vague. I'm damn well smart enough to know what I'm writing. It is vague on purpose. Because it includes all religions. Re-read my paragraph there, buddy. After all this posting, you think I'm going to exclude a religion? |
You almost contradict yourself, as you previously stated “Ok. Listen to this: I don't accept all religion's.”
I will respond to this stuff about religions being vague now: Obviously religion is vague anyone could make that observation… where do I say it isn’t vague? You seem to be drawing upon random ideas once again.
You finally quote me:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AvalonX – if, hypothetically, Christianity was proven false, how would this not further people? |
Saying in response:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bit If it was proven false, then yes, there would be progress. But to prove an entire religion requires something with power; Other humans. And it requires was to be fought. Domination over another religous group. There is no peaceful solution; Why? Look how closely people in this thread have stuck to their beliefs. There's your answer. Same reason, same principal. People do not want their OWN beliefs taken away from them, no matter how much they try to enforce their own on others. You are the all-hypocritical crap of the world. And you're not the only one.
So, what do you want? If you want equality of religions so damn much, then why are you so desperately questioning why it is still in practice? Why do you seem to want it to end? Why do you not accept the religion you yourself chose? |
– You assume there is no peaceful solution. Perhaps I am stupid not to do the same. Eh, I don’t understand “You are the all-hypocritical crap of the world.” … which means exactly??
Christianity may well exist; A ‘divine being’ – who is a man and is called ‘God’ may indeed exist and have a son called Jesus. He may have made a garden of Eden where we originated from. Once again I must circumnavigate to what I previously said: Just because a book says all this; it is not enough for me.