registered.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 176
Two New Sigs
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Re: Two New Sigs
Stop using other people's renders (note: NOT stock images, don't get confused with the terms).
It just looks too obvious sometimes. At least hide it up better.
I favor the first one however.
It just looks too obvious sometimes. At least hide it up better.
I favor the first one however.
__________________
is Mr. 18986244
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 2,593
Re: Two New Sigs
1st is a big improvement.
2nd not so much.
But definitely nice job on the first.
2nd not so much.
But definitely nice job on the first.
is actually a Dan
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 438
Re: Two New Sigs
The first is nice. Although I would increase the overall contrast.
Not like, just slide the contrast bar up, but go in and make the white spots more white, make parts of the coloring more vibrant.
It looks really good though, I like what you did with the text.
Not like, just slide the contrast bar up, but go in and make the white spots more white, make parts of the coloring more vibrant.
It looks really good though, I like what you did with the text.
__________________
Ping Island
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pescespada Island
Posts: 2,566
Re: Two New Sigs
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Souldza  Umm i never knew that i couldnt use pics that are on sites to get for this meaning. And those are stock pics, not renders. Thanks |
And no, they really are renders. Because they are taken from a rendering program. Which... renders them... so they're renders...
........
Thanks
__________________
is Mr. 18986244
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 2,593
Re: Two New Sigs
Ok i got it
But how can you know that they are renders?
I know what render is.
That stock is taken from a GFX site where it says " Stocks " so why would it be render?
Id show you the pic if id remember where i took it.
But it could be that you guys have some other thingy than in some other forums but dont think so.
But thanks for your comments.
EDIT:
Oh and could explain what render is just in case, cus i might have mistaken but i dont think so but please do explain lol
But how can you know that they are renders?
I know what render is.
That stock is taken from a GFX site where it says " Stocks " so why would it be render?
Id show you the pic if id remember where i took it.
But it could be that you guys have some other thingy than in some other forums but dont think so.
But thanks for your comments.
EDIT:
Oh and could explain what render is just in case, cus i might have mistaken but i dont think so but please do explain lol
__________________
registered.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 176
Re: Two New Sigs
This is an example of a render that I found really quick:
Second Effect C4D by ~diegodp on deviantART
Notice how it is made in C4D, a rendering program. You can tell because if you made it in Photoshop, you'd either be godly for the skill, or dumb for wasting time when you could pump out a subpar one in two minutes in an actual rendering program. So either way you can just tell it's a render.
It's all a matter of semantics. Most people use the wrong terms to describe this. If some of the old members were still here, or as disgruntled as they were a year ago, they would've been all over your ass for saying it wrong. :S
The point isn't to avoid renders altogether though. But do more work to it so you can't even tell one was even used. Look at doctor's old sigs, he was really good at that type of shit.
Stock images, on the other hand, are simply images used, like pixel art or pictures of things.
It's all just dumb wording, but that isn't the point. The point is getting better.
Second Effect C4D by ~diegodp on deviantART
Notice how it is made in C4D, a rendering program. You can tell because if you made it in Photoshop, you'd either be godly for the skill, or dumb for wasting time when you could pump out a subpar one in two minutes in an actual rendering program. So either way you can just tell it's a render.
It's all a matter of semantics. Most people use the wrong terms to describe this. If some of the old members were still here, or as disgruntled as they were a year ago, they would've been all over your ass for saying it wrong. :S
The point isn't to avoid renders altogether though. But do more work to it so you can't even tell one was even used. Look at doctor's old sigs, he was really good at that type of shit.
Stock images, on the other hand, are simply images used, like pixel art or pictures of things.
It's all just dumb wording, but that isn't the point. The point is getting better.
__________________
is Mr. 18986244
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 2,593
Re: Two New Sigs
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Souldza O rly? haha ooo youve ment C4D renders all the time? I thought you ment the guy, focal in those sigs were a render XD Thanks man |
__________________
is Mr. 18986244
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 2,593
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:00 AM.
- Site Links
- Home
- Search VDCORE
- Terms of Use, Privacy Policy
- Contact Us
- Quick Links
- Image Uploader
- Community, Member List
- Tutorials
- Articles
- Sponsors
- Button Machine and Supplies
All content copyright © 2008 Visual Design Core.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
